Nicaragua vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Nicaragua
25.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
35.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
67th
Zambia rank
64th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Zambia
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 35.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 25.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 9.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.4 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 64th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9356 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4346 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 1.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5634 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 5.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 6.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9659 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 11.84 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.84 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 17.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre 16.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5246 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 24.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre 30.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Nicaragua or Zambia?
Zambia, at 35.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 25.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Nicaragua and Zambia?
9.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Zambia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Nicaragua ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 64th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/nicaragua/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/nicaragua/zambia/">Nicaragua vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.