Namibia vs Panama: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Namibia
0.9456 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
1.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
117th
Panama rank
115th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Namibia
  • Panama
0.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.9456 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.1544 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Namibia ranks 117th and Panama ranks 115th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3936 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5537 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1601 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
1970s 0.438 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8341 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.396 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
1980s 0.4925 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9991 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5066 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
1990s 0.5511 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.8198 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2687 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
2000s 0.7491 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3111 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.8813 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.874 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.9456 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.174 1000 SLC per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Namibia or Panama?
Panama, at 1.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.9456 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Namibia and Panama?
0.1544 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Panama rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Namibia ranks 117th and Panama ranks 115th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Panama: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/namibia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/namibia/panama/">Namibia vs Panama: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.