Morocco vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Morocco
7.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
7.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
84th
Poland rank
87th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Morocco
  • Poland
0204060196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 7.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 0.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Morocco ranks 84th and Poland ranks 87th of 141 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.951 1000 SLC per square kilometre 57.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
1970s 1.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre 60.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre 58.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
1980s 2.93 1000 SLC per square kilometre 45.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre 42.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
1990s 4.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 29.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
2000s 5.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
2010s 7.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland
2020s 7.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Morocco or Poland?
Morocco, at 7.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Morocco and Poland?
0.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Poland rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Morocco ranks 84th and Poland ranks 87th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/morocco/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/morocco/poland/">Morocco vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.