Mexico vs Romania: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Mexico
7.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania
7 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
86th
Romania rank
88th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Mexico
  • Romania
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 7.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 0.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Mexico ranks 86th and Romania ranks 88th of 141 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 16.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre 14.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1970s 2.68 1000 SLC per square kilometre 21.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 19.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1980s 3.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 29.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 26.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1990s 4.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre 19.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre 15.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2000s 5.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2010s 6.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 18.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2020s 7.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.921 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mexico or Romania?
Mexico, at 7.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mexico and Romania?
0.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Romania rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mexico ranks 86th and Romania ranks 88th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Romania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/mexico/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/mexico/romania/">Mexico vs Romania: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.