Maldives vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Maldives
1.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
110th
Tunisia rank
111th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Maldives
  • Tunisia
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 1.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Maldives ahead.

Maldives ranks 110th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 6 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 28.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1719 1000 SLC per square kilometre 28.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre Maldives
1970s 69.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2774 1000 SLC per square kilometre 68.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 97.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4583 1000 SLC per square kilometre 97.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 85.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7364 1000 SLC per square kilometre 85.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 38.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 37.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 5.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.93 1000 SLC per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 0.9222 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3903 1000 SLC per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Maldives or Tunisia?
Maldives, at 1.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Maldives and Tunisia?
0.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Tunisia?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Tunisia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Maldives ranks 110th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/maldives/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/maldives/tunisia/">Maldives vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.