Malawi vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Malawi
30,869 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
30,293 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
5th
Rwanda rank
6th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Malawi
  • Rwanda
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 30,869 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 30,293 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 576 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Malawi ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 141 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 449.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,852 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,403 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 949.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,061 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8,112 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 1,207 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12,689 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11,481 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 4,030 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,699 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,669 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 11,507 1000 SLC per square kilometre 24,125 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12,619 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 21,421 1000 SLC per square kilometre 28,686 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,265 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 29,950 1000 SLC per square kilometre 30,490 1000 SLC per square kilometre 540.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or Rwanda?
Malawi, at 30,869 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 30,293 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and Rwanda?
576 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Rwanda?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Rwanda rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 5th and Rwanda ranks 6th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/malawi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/malawi/rwanda/">Malawi vs Rwanda: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.