How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tunisia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Luxembourg vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Luxembourg

1.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Tunisia

1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Luxembourg rank

109th

Tunisia rank

111th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

Luxembourg
Tunisia

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 109th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 141 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Luxembourg	Tunisia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2010s	1.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre	0.708 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2020s	1.59 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre	0.2819 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Luxembourg or Tunisia?: Luxembourg, at 1.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Luxembourg and Tunisia?: 0.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Tunisia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Luxembourg and Tunisia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Luxembourg ranks 109th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/luxembourg/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/luxembourg/tunisia/">Luxembourg vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 08 October 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.