How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Qatar?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Latvia

0.3461 1000 SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Qatar

0.2406 1000 SLC per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

132nd

Qatar rank

134th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

Latvia
Qatar

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.3461 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.2406 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 0.1055 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.4 times Qatar's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 132nd and Qatar ranks 134th of 141 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Qatar	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre	0.0209 1000 SLC per square kilometre	2.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	1.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre	0.0059 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	1.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre	0.0116 1000 SLC per square kilometre	1.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Latvia
2020s	0.3367 1000 SLC per square kilometre	0.1284 1000 SLC per square kilometre	0.2083 1000 SLC per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Latvia or Qatar?: Latvia, at 0.3461 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.2406 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Latvia and Qatar?: 0.1055 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Qatar?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Qatar rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Latvia ranks 132nd and Qatar ranks 134th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/latvia/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/latvia/qatar/">Latvia vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 08 October 2026

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.