Kuwait vs Suriname: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Kuwait
0.1321 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.1145 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait rank
137th
Suriname rank
138th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Kuwait
  • Suriname
00.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0.1321 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.1145 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0176 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Suriname ahead.

Kuwait ranks 137th and Suriname ranks 138th of 141 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0005 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0375 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.037 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0074 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0509 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0435 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.094 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0703 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0238 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait
2000s 0.1892 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0704 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1188 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait
2010s 0.3331 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1312 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2019 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait
2020s 0.1376 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1218 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0158 1000 SLC per square kilometre Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Kuwait or Suriname?
Kuwait, at 0.1321 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.1145 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Kuwait and Suriname?
0.0176 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Suriname?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Kuwait and Suriname rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Kuwait ranks 137th and Suriname ranks 138th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs Suriname: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/kuwait/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/kuwait/suriname/">Kuwait vs Suriname: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.