Jamaica vs Togo: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Jamaica
3,581 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Togo
6,690 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
13th
Togo rank
11th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Jamaica
  • Togo
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Togo currently reports 6,690 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,581 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 3,109 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Togo's figure about 1.9 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Togo ahead.

Jamaica ranks 13th and Togo ranks 11th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Togo Difference Ahead
1960s 1,175 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,119 1000 SLC per square kilometre 944.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre Togo
1970s 2,426 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,576 1000 SLC per square kilometre 149.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre Togo
1980s 2,652 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,583 1000 SLC per square kilometre 68.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 3,549 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,417 1000 SLC per square kilometre 131.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 2,296 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,174 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,878 1000 SLC per square kilometre Togo
2010s 2,869 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,471 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,602 1000 SLC per square kilometre Togo
2020s 3,587 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,586 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,999 1000 SLC per square kilometre Togo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Jamaica or Togo?
Togo, at 6,690 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,581 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Jamaica and Togo?
3,109 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Togo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Togo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Togo rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Jamaica ranks 13th and Togo ranks 11th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Togo: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/jamaica/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/jamaica/togo/">Jamaica vs Togo: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.