Ireland vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Ireland
1.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
112th
Zimbabwe rank
113th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Ireland
  • Zimbabwe
02468196119922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 1.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Ireland ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 141 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0351 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 4.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0382 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.62 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 2.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0431 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 2.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.057 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 1.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2667 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 1.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.9096 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5112 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 1.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2612 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ireland or Zimbabwe?
Ireland, at 1.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ireland and Zimbabwe?
0.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Zimbabwe?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Zimbabwe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ireland ranks 112th and Zimbabwe ranks 113th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/ireland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/ireland/zimbabwe/">Ireland vs Zimbabwe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.