Ireland vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Ireland
1.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
112th
Tunisia rank
111th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Ireland
  • Tunisia
02468196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Ireland, a difference of 0.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 141 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 6.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1719 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 4.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2774 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 2.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4583 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 2.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7465 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 1.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6774 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 1.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1712 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 1.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0383 1000 SLC per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ireland or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 1.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Ireland as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ireland and Tunisia?
0.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Tunisia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ireland ranks 112th and Tunisia ranks 111th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/ireland/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/ireland/tunisia/">Ireland vs Tunisia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.