Iraq vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Iraq
336.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
390.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
29th
Pakistan rank
27th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Iraq
  • Pakistan
05001.0k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 390.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 336.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Iraq, a difference of 53.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.2 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 27th of 141 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 15.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.85 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 70.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.85 1000 SLC per square kilometre 59.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 194.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre 31.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre 162.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 628.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 55.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 573.7 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 924.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 98.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre 826.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 525.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre 179.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 346.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 602.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 312.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre 289.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iraq or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 390.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 336.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Iraq as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iraq and Pakistan?
53.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Pakistan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iraq ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 27th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/iraq/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/iraq/pakistan/">Iraq vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.