Iceland vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Iceland
8.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
7.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
83rd
Mexico rank
86th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Iceland
  • Mexico
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 8.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mexico, a difference of 0.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 83rd and Mexico ranks 86th of 141 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 9.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 9.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.68 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 14.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 11.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 12.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.59 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 9.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 7.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5401 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Mexico?
Iceland, at 8.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Mexico?
0.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mexico rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 83rd and Mexico ranks 86th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/iceland/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/iceland/mexico/">Iceland vs Mexico: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.