Iceland vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Iceland
8.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
7.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
83rd
Malta rank
85th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Iceland
  • Malta
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 8.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Iceland ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 85th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 9.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
1970s 9.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre 20.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
1980s 14.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre 16.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
1990s 11.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 30.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 19.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
2000s 12.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
2010s 9.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
2020s 7.79 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0737 1000 SLC per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Malta?
Iceland, at 8.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Malta?
0.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 83rd and Malta ranks 85th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/iceland/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/iceland/malta/">Iceland vs Malta: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.