El Salvador vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

El Salvador
1.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
1.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
108th
Italy rank
106th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • El Salvador
  • Italy
0246196119922023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 1.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 0.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

El Salvador ranks 108th and Italy ranks 106th of 141 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2072 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre Italy
1970s 0.2935 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.68 1000 SLC per square kilometre Italy
1980s 0.4094 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.93 1000 SLC per square kilometre Italy
1990s 1.16 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre Italy
2000s 1.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.999 1000 SLC per square kilometre Italy
2010s 1.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3436 1000 SLC per square kilometre Italy
2020s 1.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2479 1000 SLC per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), El Salvador or Italy?
Italy, at 1.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between El Salvador and Italy?
0.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Italy?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Italy rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
El Salvador ranks 108th and Italy ranks 106th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/el-salvador/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/el-salvador/italy/">El Salvador vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.