Costa Rica vs Japan: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Costa Rica
1,278 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
1,442 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
22nd
Japan rank
20th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Japan
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 1,442 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1,278 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 164 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Japan ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 22nd and Japan ranks 20th of 141 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 182.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,786 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,604 1000 SLC per square kilometre Japan
1970s 234.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,609 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,374 1000 SLC per square kilometre Japan
1980s 437.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,508 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,070 1000 SLC per square kilometre Japan
1990s 1,155 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,177 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,022 1000 SLC per square kilometre Japan
2000s 1,468 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,850 1000 SLC per square kilometre 381.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre Japan
2010s 1,416 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,552 1000 SLC per square kilometre 135.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre Japan
2020s 1,138 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,409 1000 SLC per square kilometre 270.46 1000 SLC per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Costa Rica or Japan?
Japan, at 1,442 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 1,278 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Costa Rica and Japan?
164 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Japan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Costa Rica ranks 22nd and Japan ranks 20th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Japan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/costa-rica/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/costa-rica/japan/">Costa Rica vs Japan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.