Congo vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Congo
3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
8,207 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
12th
Nigeria rank
10th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Congo
  • Nigeria
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 8,207 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 4,432 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 2.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 12th and Nigeria ranks 10th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Nigeria in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 1,179 1000 SLC per square kilometre 876.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre 302.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
1970s 1,284 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,041 1000 SLC per square kilometre 243.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
1980s 1,629 1000 SLC per square kilometre 949.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre 679.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
1990s 1,675 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,978 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,303 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 2,331 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,269 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,938 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 3,361 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,069 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,708 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 3,737 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,878 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,141 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 8,207 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Nigeria?
4,432 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Nigeria rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 12th and Nigeria ranks 10th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/congo-rep/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/congo-rep/nigeria/">Congo vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.