Congo vs Jamaica: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Congo
3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
3,581 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
12th
Jamaica rank
13th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Congo
  • Jamaica
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,581 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 194 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 12th and Jamaica ranks 13th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Jamaica in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 1,179 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,175 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
1970s 1,284 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,426 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,142 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 1,629 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,652 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,023 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 1,675 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,549 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,874 1000 SLC per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 2,331 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,296 1000 SLC per square kilometre 35.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
2010s 3,361 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,869 1000 SLC per square kilometre 491.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
2020s 3,737 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,587 1000 SLC per square kilometre 150.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Jamaica?
Congo, at 3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,581 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Jamaica?
194 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Jamaica rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 12th and Jamaica ranks 13th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Jamaica: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/congo-rep/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/congo-rep/jamaica/">Congo vs Jamaica: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.