Canada vs Finland: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Canada
0.2064 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.2857 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
135th
Finland rank
133rd

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Canada
  • Finland
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.2857 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.2064 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0793 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Canada's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 135th and Finland ranks 133rd of 141 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0695 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5705 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.501 1000 SLC per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0735 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4369 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3634 1000 SLC per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.087 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4105 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3235 1000 SLC per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.117 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4252 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3082 1000 SLC per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.1507 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4006 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2499 1000 SLC per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.1726 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3439 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1713 1000 SLC per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.1929 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3175 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1246 1000 SLC per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Finland?
Finland, at 0.2857 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.2064 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Finland?
0.0793 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Finland rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 135th and Finland ranks 133rd of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Finland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/canada/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/canada/finland/">Canada vs Finland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.