Cameroon vs Congo: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Cameroon
3,465 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
14th
Congo rank
12th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Cameroon
  • Congo
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,465 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 310 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Cameroon ranks 14th and Congo ranks 12th of 141 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 578.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,179 1000 SLC per square kilometre 600.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
1970s 737.16 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,284 1000 SLC per square kilometre 546.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
1980s 699.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,629 1000 SLC per square kilometre 929.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
1990s 1,019 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,675 1000 SLC per square kilometre 655.93 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
2000s 1,613 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,331 1000 SLC per square kilometre 718.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
2010s 2,779 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,361 1000 SLC per square kilometre 581.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo
2020s 3,289 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,737 1000 SLC per square kilometre 448.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cameroon or Congo?
Congo, at 3,775 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 3,465 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cameroon and Congo?
310 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Congo rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cameroon ranks 14th and Congo ranks 12th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Congo: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/cameroon/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/cameroon/congo-rep/">Cameroon vs Congo: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.