Bhutan vs Israel: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Bhutan
61.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
55.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
58th
Israel rank
59th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Bhutan
  • Israel
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 61.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 55.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 6.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 58th and Israel ranks 59th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Israel in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 18.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 23.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre 18.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.84 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 30.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 36.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre 30.29 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 53.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 59.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre Israel
2010s 64.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre 66.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre Israel
2020s 61.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 59.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Israel?
Bhutan, at 61.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 55.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Israel?
6.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Israel rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 58th and Israel ranks 59th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Israel: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/bhutan/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/bhutan/israel/">Bhutan vs Israel: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.