Barbados vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Barbados
40.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
35.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
61st
Zambia rank
64th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Barbados
  • Zambia
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 40.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 35.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 5.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 64th of 141 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 285.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre 284.16 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 200.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 198.31 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 102.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 99.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 83.84 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 78.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 31.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 27.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 16.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 36.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 30.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Zambia?
Barbados, at 40.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 35.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Zambia?
5.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Zambia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Barbados ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 64th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/barbados/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/barbados/zambia/">Barbados vs Zambia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.