Australia vs Oman: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Australia
0.1096 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
0.0063 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
139th
Oman rank
141st

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Australia
  • Oman
00.0250.050.0750.1196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.1096 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.0063 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 0.1033 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 17.5 times Oman's.

Across all 47 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 139th and Oman ranks 141st of 141 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Oman Difference Ahead
1970s 0.051 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0501 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.0642 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0631 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.0821 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0034 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0786 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0896 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0842 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0896 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0842 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.104 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0064 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0976 1000 SLC per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Oman?
Australia, at 0.1096 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.0063 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Oman as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Oman?
0.1033 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Oman?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Australia and Oman rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 139th and Oman ranks 141st of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Oman: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/australia/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/australia/oman/">Australia vs Oman: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.