Argentina vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Argentina
3.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
2.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
99th
Norway rank
102nd

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Argentina
  • Norway
246810196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 3.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.4 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Argentina ranks 99th and Norway ranks 102nd of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 5 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 3.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4 1000 SLC per square kilometre Norway
1970s 3.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.85 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre Norway
1980s 3.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0542 1000 SLC per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 3.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.4667 1000 SLC per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 3.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6105 1000 SLC per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 3.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 3.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Argentina or Norway?
Argentina, at 3.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 2.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Argentina and Norway?
0.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Norway rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Argentina ranks 99th and Norway ranks 102nd of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/argentina/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/argentina/norway/">Argentina vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.