Angola vs India: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Angola
283.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
India
261.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
33rd
India rank
34th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Angola
  • India
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 283.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 261.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre in India, a difference of 22.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times India's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 33rd and India ranks 34th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 4 and India in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola India Difference Ahead
1960s 31.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 25.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre Angola
1970s 32.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre 44.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre India
1980s 31.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 64.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 33.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre India
1990s 49.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 91.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre 42.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre India
2000s 185.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 133 1000 SLC per square kilometre 52.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre Angola
2010s 260.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 202.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre 58.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre Angola
2020s 261.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 240.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 21.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or India?
Angola, at 283.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 261.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and India?
22.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and India?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and India rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 33rd and India ranks 34th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs India: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/angola/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/angola/india/">Angola vs India: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.