Angola vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Angola
283.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
329.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
33rd
Chile rank
31st

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Angola
  • Chile
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 329.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 283.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Angola, a difference of 45.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Angola's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 31st of 141 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 31.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 292.59 1000 SLC per square kilometre 261.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1970s 32.57 1000 SLC per square kilometre 301.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre 269.16 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1980s 31.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 332.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 301.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
1990s 49.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 347.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre 297.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2000s 185.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 418.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre 233.4 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2010s 260.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 461.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 200.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 261.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 402.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre 140.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Chile?
Chile, at 329.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 283.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Angola as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Chile?
45.42 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Chile rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Angola ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 31st of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/angola/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/angola/chile/">Angola vs Chile: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.