Afghanistan vs Cuba: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC

Afghanistan
20.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
20.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
70th
Cuba rank
69th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Cuba
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 20.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 20.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 70th and Cuba ranks 69th of 141 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 3.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.75 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.66 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 4.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 5.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 5.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 6.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 28.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 9.46 1000 SLC per square kilometre 31.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 22.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 20.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 20.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5322 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Afghanistan or Cuba?
Cuba, at 20.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 20.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Afghanistan and Cuba?
0.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Cuba rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Afghanistan ranks 70th and Cuba ranks 69th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Cuba: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/afghanistan/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/afghanistan/cuba/">Afghanistan vs Cuba: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,928 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.