Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … capita SLC

Dominican Republic
1.08 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Pakistan
1.21 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
52nd
Pakistan rank
49th

Roots and Tubers, Total: Gross Production Value … capita SLC over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Pakistan
00.511.5196119922024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1.21 1000 SLC per person against 1.08 1000 SLC per person in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.13 1000 SLC per person.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 49th of 141 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 6 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 1.41 1000 SLC per person 0.0997 1000 SLC per person 1.31 1000 SLC per person Dominican Republic
1970s 1.22 1000 SLC per person 0.1316 1000 SLC per person 1.09 1000 SLC per person Dominican Republic
1980s 0.636 1000 SLC per person 0.2485 1000 SLC per person 0.3875 1000 SLC per person Dominican Republic
1990s 0.5924 1000 SLC per person 0.317 1000 SLC per person 0.2754 1000 SLC per person Dominican Republic
2000s 0.6118 1000 SLC per person 0.4321 1000 SLC per person 0.1797 1000 SLC per person Dominican Republic
2010s 0.6624 1000 SLC per person 0.6384 1000 SLC per person 0.0241 1000 SLC per person Dominican Republic
2020s 0.8304 1000 SLC per person 1.04 1000 SLC per person 0.2081 1000 SLC per person Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Dominican Republic or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 1.21 1000 SLC per person against 1.08 1000 SLC per person in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
0.13 1000 SLC per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Pakistan?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Pakistan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Dominican Republic ranks 52nd and Pakistan ranks 49th of 141 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/dominican-republic/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/dominican-republic/pakistan/">Dominican Republic vs Pakistan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita
Unit
1000 SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 8,066 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.