Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
65th
Equatorial Guinea rank
68th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000196219932024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 65th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 68th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Equatorial Guinea?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea?
29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 65th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 68th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of/bosnia-and-herzegovina/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of/bosnia-and-herzegovina/equatorial-guinea/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Equatorial Guinea: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,151 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.