Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Bhutan rank
56th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
55th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0000197019972024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 56th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 55th of 168 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Bhutan
1980s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Bhutan
1990s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 56th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 55th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of/bhutan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-unit-of/bhutan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Bhutan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 9,151 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.