Peru vs Sri Lanka: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Peru
1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Peru rank
72nd
Sri Lanka rank
69th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Peru
  • Sri Lanka
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Peru ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 0.452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 0.4528 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 0.5394 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 0.8498 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9832 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1335 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0481 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Peru or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Peru as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Peru and Sri Lanka?
0.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Peru and Sri Lanka rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Peru ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 69th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Sri Lanka: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/peru/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/peru/sri-lanka/">Peru vs Sri Lanka: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.