Oman vs Suriname: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Oman
0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
165th
Suriname rank
166th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Oman
  • Suriname
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.6 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Suriname ahead.

Oman ranks 165th and Suriname ranks 166th of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 4 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2000s 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2010s 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0085 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Oman or Suriname?
Oman, at 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Oman and Suriname?
0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Suriname?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Oman and Suriname rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Oman ranks 165th and Suriname ranks 166th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Suriname: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/oman/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/oman/suriname/">Oman vs Suriname: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.