Oman vs Singapore: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Oman
0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman rank
165th
Singapore rank
167th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Oman
  • Singapore
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 2.6 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Singapore ahead.

Oman ranks 165th and Singapore ranks 167th of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Singapore Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5741 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5726 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1892 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0066 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2010s 0.0095 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0069 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Oman or Singapore?
Oman, at 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Oman and Singapore?
0.0067 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Singapore?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Oman and Singapore rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Oman ranks 165th and Singapore ranks 167th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Oman vs Singapore: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/oman/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/oman/singapore/">Oman vs Singapore: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.