Niger vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Niger
0.2246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.2154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger rank
131st
Norway rank
133rd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Niger
  • Norway
00.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Niger currently reports 0.2246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Niger ranks 131st and Norway ranks 133rd of 169 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.0239 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4402 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4163 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2969 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.0216 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2994 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2778 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.0274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2238 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.0628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1592 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.1942 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2439 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Niger or Norway?
Niger, at 0.2246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Niger and Norway?
0.0092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Niger and Norway rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Niger ranks 131st and Norway ranks 133rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/niger/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/niger/norway/">Niger vs Norway: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.