Morocco vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Morocco
1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
84th
Spain rank
87th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Morocco
  • Spain
0123196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.

Morocco ranks 84th and Spain ranks 87th of 169 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1242 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1970s 0.1739 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1980s 0.3837 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
1990s 0.5881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2000s 0.7738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5936 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2010s 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain
2020s 0.9748 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9938 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Morocco or Spain?
Morocco, at 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9625 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Morocco and Spain?
0.0575 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Spain?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Spain rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Morocco ranks 84th and Spain ranks 87th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/morocco/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/morocco/spain/">Morocco vs Spain: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.