Mauritius vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mauritius
2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
41st
Samoa rank
40th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Samoa
012345196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

Mauritius ranks 41st and Samoa ranks 40th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8662 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 2.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 1.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 2.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.67 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 2.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mauritius or Samoa?
Samoa, at 2.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mauritius and Samoa?
0.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Samoa rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mauritius ranks 41st and Samoa ranks 40th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mauritius/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/mauritius/samoa/">Mauritius vs Samoa: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.