Malta vs Nepal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malta
5.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
6.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
23rd
Nepal rank
21st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malta
  • Nepal
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 6.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 5.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 23rd and Nepal ranks 21st of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 16.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 15.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5998 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 12.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8781 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 23.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 16.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 8.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 5.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2868 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malta or Nepal?
Nepal, at 6.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 5.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malta and Nepal?
0.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Nepal rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malta ranks 23rd and Nepal ranks 21st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Nepal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malta/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malta/nepal/">Malta vs Nepal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.