Maldives vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Maldives
0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
164th
Qatar rank
162nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Maldives
  • Qatar
0246196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.7 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 47 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Maldives ahead.

Maldives ranks 164th and Qatar ranks 162nd of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 5 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Qatar Difference Ahead
1970s 4.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1980s 5.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
1990s 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2000s 0.419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4184 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2010s 0.0527 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0516 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0036 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Maldives or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0134 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Maldives and Qatar?
0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Qatar?
47 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Qatar rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Maldives ranks 164th and Qatar ranks 162nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/maldives/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/maldives/qatar/">Maldives vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.