Malawi vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi
30.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
32.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
5th
Nigeria rank
2nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malawi
  • Nigeria
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 32.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 30.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 2.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Nigeria has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 5th and Nigeria ranks 2nd of 169 countries.

Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3946 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 0.8693 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 3.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 10.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 20.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 24.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 29.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 32.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 30.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and Nigeria?
2.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nigeria?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Nigeria rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 5th and Nigeria ranks 2nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/malawi/nigeria/">Malawi vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.