Kiribati vs Portugal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Kiribati
0.8543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
0.8881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
92nd
Portugal rank
91st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Kiribati
  • Portugal
12345196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.8881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0338 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 92nd and Portugal ranks 91st of 169 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 1.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 2.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7444 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 2.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9446 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 0.8526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 0.8809 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.981 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 0.8704 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 0.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Kiribati or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.8881 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.8543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Kiribati and Portugal?
0.0338 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Portugal rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Kiribati ranks 92nd and Portugal ranks 91st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Portugal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/kiribati/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/kiribati/portugal/">Kiribati vs Portugal: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.