Ireland vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ireland
1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy
1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ireland rank
77th
Italy rank
80th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ireland
  • Italy
02468196119922023

How they compare

Ireland currently reports 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.

Ireland ranks 77th and Italy ranks 80th of 169 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ireland Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 6.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1970s 4.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1980s 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4297 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
1990s 2.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2000s 1.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0536 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2010s 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland
2020s 1.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ireland or Italy?
Ireland, at 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Italy as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ireland and Italy?
0.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Italy?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ireland and Italy rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ireland ranks 77th and Italy ranks 80th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ireland vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ireland/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ireland/italy/">Ireland vs Italy: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.