Iraq vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iraq
0.1367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
144th
Namibia rank
147th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iraq
  • Namibia
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0.1367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iraq's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Iraq ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 147th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0419 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0359 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0466 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0761 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0524 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 0.2467 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0587 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 0.3628 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0814 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2815 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 0.2068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0979 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 0.2411 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1359 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iraq or Namibia?
Iraq, at 0.1367 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iraq and Namibia?
0.0316 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and Namibia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iraq ranks 144th and Namibia ranks 147th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iraq/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iraq/namibia/">Iraq vs Namibia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.