Iceland vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland
0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
163rd
Qatar rank
162nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iceland
  • Qatar
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 163rd and Qatar ranks 162nd of 169 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Qatar Difference Ahead
1970s 0.022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0303 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0256 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0214 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.0175 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.0223 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0181 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Qatar?
0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Qatar?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Qatar rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 163rd and Qatar ranks 162nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/qatar/">Iceland vs Qatar: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.