Haiti vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Haiti
5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
4.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti rank
26th
Poland rank
29th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Haiti
  • Poland
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Poland, a difference of 0.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.2 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Haiti ranks 26th and Poland ranks 29th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 3.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 37.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 33.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1970s 4.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 38.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 33.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1980s 5.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 28.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
1990s 5.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2000s 6.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland
2010s 8.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
2020s 5.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1275 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Haiti or Poland?
Haiti, at 5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 4.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Haiti and Poland?
0.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Haiti and Poland rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Haiti ranks 26th and Poland ranks 29th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/haiti/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/haiti/poland/">Haiti vs Poland: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.