Guatemala vs Liberia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Guatemala
1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Liberia
1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
76th
Liberia rank
78th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Guatemala
  • Liberia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Liberia, a difference of 0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Liberia ahead.

Guatemala ranks 76th and Liberia ranks 78th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Liberia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1970s 0.107 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4243 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1980s 0.1566 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6241 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4675 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
1990s 0.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5797 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1197 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
2000s 0.9293 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9376 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Liberia
2010s 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1895 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2376 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Guatemala or Liberia?
Guatemala, at 1.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Liberia as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Guatemala and Liberia?
0.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Liberia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Liberia rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Guatemala ranks 76th and Liberia ranks 78th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Liberia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guatemala/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/guatemala/liberia/">Guatemala vs Liberia: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.