Ghana vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ghana
32.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
32.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana rank
3rd
Nigeria rank
2nd

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ghana
  • Nigeria
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 32.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 32.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana, a difference of 0.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 3rd and Nigeria ranks 2nd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 3.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1970s 3.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6563 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0846 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
1990s 8.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 13.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 21.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 24.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria
2020s 30.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ghana or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 32.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 32.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ghana as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ghana and Nigeria?
0.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ghana and Nigeria rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ghana ranks 3rd and Nigeria ranks 2nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ghana/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ghana/nigeria/">Ghana vs Nigeria: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.