Germany vs Tonga: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Germany
8.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tonga
7.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
16th
Tonga rank
18th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Germany
  • Tonga
102030196119922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 8.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tonga, a difference of 0.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tonga ahead.

Germany ranks 16th and Tonga ranks 18th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Tonga Difference Ahead
1960s 23.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tonga
1970s 16.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 32.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tonga
1980s 13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tonga
1990s 8.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.46 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tonga
2000s 8.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 7.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0821 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 8.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Germany or Tonga?
Germany, at 8.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 7.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tonga as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Germany and Tonga?
0.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Tonga?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Germany and Tonga rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Germany ranks 16th and Tonga ranks 18th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Tonga: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/germany/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/germany/tonga/">Germany vs Tonga: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.