Gambia vs Mali: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Gambia
0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mali
0.1725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
140th
Mali rank
141st

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Gambia
  • Mali
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mali, a difference of 0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 140th and Mali ranks 141st of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 6 and Mali in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Mali Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0106 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 0.1157 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1078 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 0.0862 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0046 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0816 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 0.0929 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 0.1139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0597 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0542 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 0.1629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1393 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1755 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Gambia or Mali?
Gambia, at 0.1751 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1725 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mali as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Gambia and Mali?
0.0026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mali?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Mali rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Gambia ranks 140th and Mali ranks 141st of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Mali: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/gambia-the/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/gambia-the/mali/">Gambia vs Mali: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.