French Polynesia vs Kazakhstan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

French Polynesia
0.1997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.1897 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
135th
Kazakhstan rank
137th

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Kazakhstan
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.1997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1897 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 135th and Kazakhstan ranks 137th of 169 countries.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3446 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1521 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1925 1000 Int$ per square kilometre French Polynesia
2000s 0.2948 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2144 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0805 1000 Int$ per square kilometre French Polynesia
2010s 0.2362 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1584 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0779 1000 Int$ per square kilometre French Polynesia
2020s 0.2034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1992 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), French Polynesia or Kazakhstan?
French Polynesia, at 0.1997 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1897 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between French Polynesia and Kazakhstan?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Kazakhstan?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Kazakhstan rank globally for roots and tubers, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
French Polynesia ranks 135th and Kazakhstan ranks 137th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Kazakhstan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/french-polynesia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/roots-and-tubers-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/french-polynesia/kazakhstan/">French Polynesia vs Kazakhstan: Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,616 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Roots and Tubers, Total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.